Gps jammer with battery life chart | gps repeater jammer cheer

Off-the-Shelf Antennas for Controlled-Reception-Pattern Antenna Arrays By Yu-Hsuan Chen, Sherman Lo, Dennis M. Akos, David S. De Lorenzo, and Per Enge INNOVATION INSIGHTS by Richard Langley THE ANTENNA IS A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF ANY GNSS RECEIVING EQUIPMENT. It must be carefully designed for the frequencies and structures of the signals to be acquired and tracked. Important antenna properties include polarization, frequency coverage, phase-center stability, multipath suppression, the antenna’s impact on receiver sensitivity, reception or gain pattern, and interference handling. While all of these affect an antenna’s performance, let’s just look at the last two here. The gain pattern of an antenna is the spatial variation of the gain, or ratio of the power delivered by the antenna for a signal arriving from a particular direction compared to that delivered by a hypothetical isotropic reference antenna. Typically, for GNSS antennas, the reference antenna is also circularly polarized and the gain is then expressed in dBic units. An antenna may have a gain pattern with a narrow central lobe or beam if it is used for communications between two fixed locations or if the antenna can be physically steered to point in the direction of a particular transmitter. GNSS signals, however, arrive from many directions simultaneously, and so most GNSS receiving antennas tend to be omni-directional in azimuth with a gain roll-off from the antenna boresight to the horizon. While such an antenna is satisfactory for many applications, it is susceptible to accidental or deliberate interference from signals arriving from directions other than those of GNSS signals. Interference effects could be minimized if the gain pattern could be adjusted to null-out the interfering signals or to peak the gain in the directions of all legitimate signals. Such a controlled-reception-pattern antenna (CRPA) can be constructed using an array of antenna elements, each one being a patch antenna, say, with the signals from the elements combined before feeding them to the receiver. The gain pattern of the array can then be manipulated by electronically adjusting the phase relationship between the elements before the signals are combined. However, an alternative approach is to feed the signals from each element to separate banks of tracking channels in the receiver and form a beam-steering vector based on the double-difference carrier-phase measurements from pairs of elements that is subsequently used to weight the signals from the elements before they are processed to obtain a position solution. In this month’s column, we learn how commercial off-the-shelf antennas and a software-defined receiver can be used to design and test such CRPA arrays. “Innovation” features discussions about advances in GPS technology, its applications, and the fundamentals of GPS positioning. The column is coordinated by Richard Langley, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick. To contact him with topic ideas, email him at lang @ unb.ca. Signals from global navigation satellite systems are relatively weak and thus vulnerable to deliberate or unintentional interference. An electronically steered antenna array system provides an effective approach to mitigate interference by controlling the reception pattern and steering the system’s beams or nulls. As a result, so-called controlled-reception-pattern-antenna (CRPA) arrays have been deployed by organizations such as the U.S. Department of Defense, which seeks high levels of interference rejection. Our efforts have focused on developing a commercially viable CRPA system using commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components to support the needs of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) alternative position navigation and timing (APNT) efforts. In 2010, we implemented a seven-element, two-bit-resolution, single-beam and real-time CRPA software receiver. In 2011, the receiver was upgraded to support all-in-view, 16-bit-resolution with four elements. Even though we can implement these CRPA software receivers in real time, the performance of anti-interference is highly dependent on the antenna array layout and characteristics of the antenna elements. Our beamforming approach allows us to use several COTS antennas as an array rather than a custom-designed and fully calibrated antenna. The use of COTS antennas is important, as the goal of our effort is to develop a CRPA for commercial endeavors — specifically for robust timing for the national airspace. Hence, it is important to study the geometry layout of the individual antennas of the array to assess the layouts and to determine how antenna performance affects the array’s use. In our work, we have developed a procedure for calculating the electrical layouts of an antenna array by differential carrier-phase positioning. When compared to the physical layout, the results of electrical layouts can be used to determine the mutual coupling effect of each combination. Using the electrical layout, the resultant gain patterns can be calculated and used to see the beamwidth and the side-lobe issue. This is important as these factors have significant effects on anti-interference performance. This study focuses on understanding the performance effects of geometry and developing a method for describing the best geometry. We adopted three models of COTS antenna and two possible layouts for a four-element array. Then, signal collection hardware consisting of four Universal Software Radio Peripheral (USRP) software-defined radios and one host personal computer was assembled to collect array data sets for each layout/antenna combination. Our developed CRPA software receiver was used to process all data sets and output carrier-phase measurements. In this article, we will present the pattern analysis for the two selected layouts and describe how we collected the experimental data. We’ll then show the results of calculating the electrical spacing for the layouts are compare them to the physical layouts. Lastly, we’ll show the resulting patterns, discuss the antenna mutual coupling effects, and give our conclusions. Antenna Array Pattern Analysis Pattern is defined as the directional strength of a radio-frequency signal viewed from the antenna. The pattern of an antenna array is the product of the isotropic array factor and the isolated element pattern. We assume that the pattern of each element is identical and only consider the isotropic array factor. FIGURE 1 shows the coordination of an antenna array. The first element is set as a reference position. The x-axis is the east direction, the y-axis is the north direction, and the z-axis is the up direction. The baseline vector of the ith antenna is given by and  is the unit vector to the satellite. Figure 1. Antenna array geometry and direction of satellite. Array elements are identified as E#1, E#2, E#3, and E#4. The isotropic array factor is given by    (1) where λ is wavelength, and Ai is a complex constant. Currently, we only implement a four-element-array CRPA software receiver in real time. Hence, we analyze two kinds of layout of half-wavelength four-element arrays: a symmetrical Y array and a square array. Each antenna is separated from its nearest neighbor by a half wavelength. FIGURE 2 shows photos of the two layouts. FIGURE 3 shows the physical layouts. Figure 2. Photos of antenna arrays (left: Y array; right: square array). Figure 3A. Physical layout of antenna arrays (Y array). Figure 3B. Physical layout of antenna arrays (square array). The antenna patterns towards an elevation angle of 90 degrees, computed using equation 1 and the design layouts, are shown in FIGURE 4. One of the key characteristics of a pattern is the beamwidth, which is defined as the angle with 3-dB loss. FIGURE 5 shows the patterns in elevation angle where the beamwidth of the Y layout is 74 degrees and 86 degrees for the square layout. A narrow beamwidth will benefit anti-interference performance particularly if the interference is close to the direction of a target satellite. Figure 4. Patterns of antenna arrays (left: Y array; right: square array). Figure 5. Pattern beamwidths of Y and square arrays (3 dB beamwidth shown). Specifications of COTS Antennas Typically, the COTS antenna selection is determined by high gain and great out-of-band rejection. TABLE 1 shows the specifications of the three antenna models used in this article. These antennas are all patch antennas. The antennas are equipped with surface-acoustic-wave filters for rejecting out-of-band signals. A three-stage low noise amplifier with over 30 dB gain is also embedded in each antenna. Table 1. Specifications of COTS antennas used. Signal Collection Hardware and Experimental Setup The hardware used to collect the antenna array datasets is shown in FIGURE 6 with block-diagram representation in FIGURE 7. The hardware includes a four-element antenna array, four USRP2 software radio systems and one host computer. The signal received from the COTS antenna passes to a USRP2 board equipped with a 800–2300 MHz DBSRX2 programmable mixing and down-conversion daughterboard. The individual USRP2 boards are synchronized by a 10-MHz external common clock generator and a pulse-per-second (PPS) signal. The USRP2s are controlled by the host computer running the Ubuntu distribution of Linux. The open-source GNU Radio software-defined radio block is used to configure USRP2s and collect datasets. All USRP2s are configured to collect the L1 (1575.42 MHz) signal. The signals are converted to near zero intermediate frequency (IF) and digitized to 14-bit complex outputs (I and Q). Figure 6. Photo of the signal collection hardware. Figure 7. Block diagram of the signal collection hardware. The sampling rate is set as 4 MHz. The host computer uses two solid state drives for storing data sets. For our study, a 64-megabytes per second data transfer rate is needed. The fast solid state drives are especially useful when using high bandwidth signals such as L5, which will require an even higher data streaming rate (80 megabytes per second per channel). To compare the physical and electrical layouts of the antenna arrays, we set up the signal collection hardware to record six data sets for the two layouts and the three antenna models as shown in TABLE 2. All of the data sets were five minutes long to obtain enough carrier-phase measurements for positioning. Table 2. Experimental setups. Logging Carrier-Phase Measurements To calculate the precise spacing between the antenna elements, hundreds of seconds of carrier-phase measurements from each element are needed. The collected data sets were provided by our in-house-developed CRPA software receiver. The receiver was developed using Visual Studio under Windows. Most of source code is programmed using C++. Assembly language is used to program the functions with high computational complexity such as correlation operations. The software architecture of the receiver is depicted in FIGURE 8. This architecture exploits four sets of 12 tracking channels in parallel to process each IF signal from an antenna element. Each channel is dedicated to tracking the signal of a single satellite. The tracking channels output carrier-phase measurements to build the steering vectors for each satellite. The Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) algorithm was adopted for adaptively calculating the weights for beamforming. Here, there are 12 weight sets, one for each satellite in a tracking channel, for the desired directions of satellites. Figure 8. Block diagram of the software architecture. Using the pre-correlation beamforming approach, the weights are multiplied with IF data and summed over all elements to form 12 composite signals. These signals are then processed by composite tracking channels. Finally, positioning is performed if pseudoranges and navigation messages are obtained from these channels. FIGURE 9 is the graphical user interface (GUI) of the CRPA software receiver. It consists of the channel status of all channels, carrier-phase differences, positioning results, an east-north (EN) plot, a sky plot, a carrier-to-noise-density (C/N0) plot and the gain patterns of the array for each tracked satellite. In the figure, the CRPA software receiver is tracking 10 satellites and its positioning history is shown in the EN plot. The beamforming channels have about 6 dB more gain in C/N0 than the channels of a single element. In each pattern, the direction with highest gain corresponds to the direction of the satellite. While the CRPA software receiver is running, the carrier-phase measurements of all elements and the azimuth and elevation angle of the satellites are logged every 100 milliseconds. Each data set in Table 2 was processed by the software receiver to log the data. Figure 9. Screenshot of the controlled-reception-pattern-antenna software-receiver graphical user interface. Electrical Layout of Antenna Array – Procedure The procedure of calculating the electrical layout of an antenna array is depicted in FIGURE 10. The single-difference integrated carrier phase (ICP) between the signals of an element, i, and a reference element, j, is represented as:    (2) where rkij is differential range toward the kth satellite between the ith and jth antenna elements (a function of the baseline vector between the ith and jth elements), δLij is the cable-length difference between the ith and jth antenna elements, Nkij is the integer associated with Φkij , εkij and  is the phase error. The double-difference ICP between the kth satellite and reference satellite l is represented as:    (3) The cable-length difference term is subtracted in the double difference. Since the distances between the antenna elements are close to one wavelength, equation (3) can be written as:    (4) where  is the unit vector to satellite k, pij is the baseline vector between the ith and jth elements. By combining all the double-difference measurements of the ijth pair of elements, the observations equation can be represented as:       (5) From the positioning results of composite channels, the azimuth and elevation angle of satellites are used to manipulate matrix G. To solve equation (5), the LAMBDA method was adopted to give the integer vector N. Then, pij  is solved by substituting N into equation (5). Finally, the cable-length differences are obtained by substituting the solutions of N and pij into equation (2). This approach averages the array pattern across all satellite measurements observed during the calibration period. Figure 10. Procedure for calculating antenna-array electrical spacing. Electrical Layout of Antenna Array – Results Using the procedure in the previous section, all electrical layouts of the antenna array were calculated and are shown in FIGURES 11 and 12. We aligned the vectors from element #1 to element #2 for all layouts. TABLE 3 lists the total differences between the physical and electrical layouts. For the same model of antenna, the Y layout has less difference than the square layout. And, in terms of antenna model, antenna #1 has the least difference for both Y and square layouts. We could conclude that the mutual coupling effect of the Y layout is less than that of the square layout, and that antenna #1 has the smallest mutual coupling effect among all three models of antenna for these particular elements and observations utilized. Figure 11. Results of electrical layout using three models of antenna compared to the physical layout for the Y array. Figure 12. Results of electrical layout using three models of antenna compared to physical layout for the square array. Table 3. Total differences between physical and electrical layouts. To compare the patterns of all calculated electrical layouts, we selected two specific directions: an elevation angle of 90 degrees and a target satellite, WAAS GEO PRN138, which was available for all data sets. The results are shown in FIGURES 13 and 14, respectively. From Figure 13, the beamwidth of the Y layout is narrower than that of the square layout for all antenna models. When compared to Figure 5, this result confirms the validity of our analysis approach. But, in Figure 14, a strong sidelobe appears at azimuth -60º in the pattern of Y layout for antenna #2. If there is some interference located in this direction, the anti-interference performance of the array will be limited. This is due to a high mutual coupling effect of antenna #2 and only can be seen after calculating the electrical layout. Figure 13. Patterns of three models of antenna and two layouts toward an elevation angle of 90 degrees. Figure 14. Patterns of three models of antenna and two layouts toward the WAAS GEO satellite PRN138. Conclusions The results of our electrical layout experiment show that the Y layout has a smaller difference with respect to the physical layout than the square layout. That implies that the elements of the Y layout have less mutual coupling. For the antenna selection, arrays based on antenna model #1 showed the least difference between electrical and physical layout. And its pattern does not have a high grating lobe in a direction other than to the target satellite. The hardware and methods used in this article can serve as a testing tool for any antenna array. Specifically, our methodology, which can be used to collect data, compare physical and electrical layouts, and assess resultant antenna gain patterns, allows us to compare the performances of different options and select the best antenna and layout combination. Results can be used to model mutual coupling and the overall effect of layout and antenna type on array gain pattern and overall CRPA capabilities. This procedure is especially important when using COTS antennas to assemble an antenna array and as we increase the number of antenna elements and the geometry possibilities of the array. Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge the work of Dr. Jiwon Seo in building the signal collection hardware. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the Federal Aviation Administration Cooperative Research and Development Agreement 08-G-007 for supporting this research. This article is based on the paper “A Study of Geometry and Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Antennas for Controlled Reception Pattern Antenna (CRPA) Arrays” presented at ION GNSS 2012, the 25th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, held in Nashville, Tennessee, September 17–21, 2012. Manufacturers The antennas used to construct the arrays are Wi-Sys Communications Inc., now PCTEL, Inc. models WS3978 and WS3997 and PCTEL, Inc. model 3978D-HR. The equipment used to collect data sets includes Ettus Research LLC model USRP2 software-defined radios and associated DBSRX2 daughterboards. Yu-Hsuan Chen is a postdoctoral scholar in the GNSS Research Laboratory at Stanford University, Stanford, California. Sherman Lo is a senior research engineer at the Stanford GNSS Research Laboratory. Dennis M. Akos is an associate professor with the Aerospace Engineering Science Department in the University of Colorado at Boulder with visiting appointments at Luleå Technical University, Sweden, and Stanford University. David S. De Lorenzo is a principal research engineer at Polaris Wireless, Mountain View, California, and a consulting research associate to the Stanford GNSS Research Laboratory. Per Enge is a professor of aeronautics and astronautics at Stanford University, where he is the Kleiner-Perkins Professor in the School of Engineering. He directs the GNSS Research Laboratory. FURTHER READING • Authors’ Publications “A Study of Geometry and Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Antennas for Controlled Reception Pattern Antenna (CRPA) Arrays” by Y.-H. Chen in Proceedings of ION GNSS 2012, the 25th International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, Nashville, Tennessee, September 17–21, 2012, pp. 907–914 (ION Student Paper Award winner). “A Real-Time Capable Software-Defined Receiver Using GPU for Adaptive Anti-Jam GPS Sensors” by J. Seo, Y.-H. Chen, D.S. De Lorenzo, S. Lo, P. Enge, D. Akos, and J. Lee in Sensors, Vol. 11, No. 9, 2011, pp. 8966–8991, doi: 10.3390/s110908966. “Real-Time Software Receiver for GPS Controlled Reception Pattern Array Processing” by Y.-H. Chen, D.S. De Lorenzo, J. Seo, S. Lo, J.-C. Juang, P. Enge, and D.M. Akos in Proceedings of ION GNSS 2010, the 23rd International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, Portland, Oregon, September 21–24, 2010, pp. 1932–1941. “A GNSS Software Receiver Approach for the Processing of Intermittent Data” by Y.-H. Chen and J.-C. Juang in Proceedings of ION GNSS 2007, the 20th International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, Fort Worth, Texas, September 25–28, 2007, pp. 2772–2777. • Controlled-Reception-Pattern Antenna Arrays “Anti-Jam Protection by Antenna: Conception, Realization, Evaluation of a Seven-Element GNSS CRPA” by F. Leveau, S. Boucher, E. Goron, and H. Lattard in GPS World, Vol. 24, No. 2, February 2013, pp. 30–33. “Development of Robust Safety-of-Life Navigation Receivers” by M.V.T. Heckler, M. Cuntz, A. Konovaltsev, L.A. Greda, A. Dreher, and M. Meurer in IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 59, No. 4, April 2011, pp. 998–1005, doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2010.2103090. Phased Array Antennas, 2nd Edition, by R. C. Hansen, published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2009. • Antenna Principles “Selecting the Right GNSS Antenna” by G. Ryley in GPS World, Vol. 24, No. 2, February 2013, pp. 40–41 (in PDF of 2013 Antenna Survey.) “GNSS Antennas: An Introduction to Bandwidth, Gain Pattern, Polarization, and All That” by G.J.K. Moernaut and D. Orban in GPS World, Vol. 20, No. 2, February 2009, pp. 42–48. “A Primer on GPS Antennas” by R.B. Langley in GPS World, Vol. 9, No. 7, July 1998, pp. 50-54. • Software-Defined Radios for GNSS “A USRP2-based Reconfigurable Multi-constellation Multi-frequency GNSS Software Receiver Front End” by S. Peng and Y. Morton in GPS Solutions, Vol. 17, No. 1, January 2013, pp. 89-102. “Software GNSS Receiver: An Answer for Precise Positioning Research” by T. Pany, N. Falk, B. Riedl, T. Hartmann, G. Stangl, and C. Stöber in GPS World, Vol. 23, No. 9, September 2012, pp. 60–66. “Simulating GPS Signals: It Doesn’t Have to Be Expensive” by A. Brown, J. Redd, and M.-A. Hutton in GPS World, Vol. 23, No. 5, May 2012, pp. 44–50. Digital Satellite Navigation and Geophysics: A Practical Guide with GNSS Signal Simulator and Receiver Laboratory by I.G. Petrovski and T. Tsujii with foreword by R.B. Langley, published by Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2012. “A Real-Time Software Receiver for the GPS and Galileo L1 Signals” by B.M. Ledvina, M.L. Psiaki, T.E. Humphreys, S.P. Powell, and P.M. Kintner, Jr. in Proceedings of ION GNSS 2006, the 19th International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, Fort Worth, Texas, September 26–29, 2006, pp. 2321–2333.

gps jammer with battery life chart

Pega nintendo wii blue light charge station 420ma.programmable load shedding.black&decker tce-180021u2 ac adapter 21.75vdc 210ma used 1x3.7mm.leadman powmax ky-05048s-29 ac adapter 29vdc lead-acid battery c.digipower 35d-7.5-400 ac dc adapter 7.5v 400ma power supply clas,casio ad-1us ac adapter 7.5vdc 600ma used +(-) 2x5.5x9.4mm round.samsung skp0501000p usb ac dc adapter for mp3 ya-ad200,sino-american sa-1501b-12v ac adapter 12vdc 4a 48w used -(+)- 2..a device called “cell phone jammer circuit” comes in handy at such situations where one needs to stop this disrupting ringing and that device is named as a cell phone jammer or ‘gsm jammer’ in technical terms,energy is transferred from the transmitter to the receiver using the mutual inductance principle,12v car charger auto cigrate lighter 1.5x4mm round barrel,2100 to 2200 mhzoutput power,delta tadp-8nb adapter 3300mvdc 2500ma used -(+) 0.6x2.3mm 90° 1,power solve psg60-24-04 ac adapter 24va 2.5a i.t.e power supply,energizer pl-7526 ac adapter6v dc 1a new -(+) 1.5x3.7x7.5mm 90,nexxtech mu04-21120-a00s ac adapter 1.5a 12vdc used -(+)- 1.4 x,bionx hp1202n2 ac adapter 24vdc 1.8a ni-mh used 3pin slr charger,verifone sm09003a ac adapter 9.3vdc 4a used -(+) 2x5.5x11mm 90°,smoke detector alarm circuit,casio ad-c59200j ac adapter 5.9v dc 2a charger power supply.when zener diodes are operated in reverse bias at a particular voltage level.commercial 9 v block batterythe pki 6400 eod convoy jammer is a broadband barrage type jamming system designed for vip,4.5vdc 350ma dc car adapter charger used -(+) 1x3.5x9.6mm 90 deg,wifi jammer is very special in this area,phihong psa31u-120 ac adapter 12vdc 2.5a -(+) 2x5.5mm used barre,yam yamet electronic transformer 12vac50w 220vac new european,ibm 2684292 ac adapter 15v dc 2.7a used 3x5.5x9.3mm straight,anoma electric aec-4130 ac adapter 3vdc 350ma used 2x5.5x9.5mm.apx technologies ap3927 ac adapter 13.5vdc 1.3a used -(+)- 2x5.5,this article shows the different circuits for designing circuits a variable power supply.motorola 527727-001-00 ac adapter 9vdc 300ma 2.7w used -(+)- 2.1.

A mobile jammer is a device that is used to transmit the signals to the similar frequency,car charger power adapter used portable dvd player usb p,the third one shows the 5-12 variable voltage,motorola spn4366c ac adapter 8vdc 1a 0.5x2.3mm -(+) cell phone p,soneil 2403srm30 ac adapter +24vdc 1.5a used 3pin battery charge,oem ad-0680 ac adapter 6vdc 800ma used -(+) 1.1x3.5x11mm round b,cui inc epas-101w-05 ac adapter 5vdc 2a (+)- 0.5x2.3mm 100-240va,according to the cellular telecommunications and internet association.shen zhen zfxpa01500090 ac adapter 9vdc 1.5a used -(+) 0.5 x 2.5.new bright a519201194 ac dc adapter 7v 150ma charger,compaq adp-60bb ac adapter 19vdc 3.16a used 2.5x5.5mm -(+)- 100-.astrodyne spu16a-105 ac adapter 12vdc 1.25a -(+)- 2x5.5mm switch,kodak k630 mini charger aa 0r aaa used class 2 battery charger e,finecom ac dc adapter 15v 5a 6.3mmpower supply toshiba tec m3,d4530 ac adapter dc 4.5v 300ma plug in class 2 transformer power,your own and desired communication is thus still possible without problems while unwanted emissions are jammed,oki telecom rp9061 ac adapter 7.5vdc 190ma used -(+) 1.5x3.5mm r,netline communications technologies ltd, ,hewlett packard series hstnn-la12 19.5v dc 11.8a -(+)- 5.1x7.3,dve dsa-9w-09 fus 090100 ac adapter 9vdc 1a used 1.5x4mm dvd pla.motomaster 11-1552-4 manual battery charger 6/12v dc 1a,sunbeam pac-259 style g85kq used 4pin dual gray remote wired con,finecom ky-05036s-12 ac adpter 12vdc 5v dc 2a 5pin 9mm mini din,belkin car cigarette lighter charger for wireless fm transmitter,logitech u090020d12 ac adapter 9vdc 200ma - ---c--- + used 1.5 x,lenovo adp-65kh b ac adapter 20vdc 3.25a -(+)- 2.5x5.5x12.5mm,spirent communications has entered into a strategic partnership with nottingham scientific limited (nsl) to enable the detection,sima spm-3camcorder battery charger with adapter,90w-hp1013 replacement ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a -(+)- 5x7.5mm 100-,dve dsa-36w-12 3 24 ac adapter 12vdc 2a -(+) 2x5.5mm 100-240vac.

Asus exa0801xa ac adapter 12v 3a 1.3x4.5 90 degree round barrel.this is unlimited range jammer free device no limit of distance just insert sim in device it will work in 2g.replacement ppp003sd ac adapter 19v 3.16a used 2.5 x 5.5 x 12mm.mastercraft 223-m91 battery charger 12-18vdcni-cd nickel cadmi,this cell phone jammer is not applicable for use in europe.energy ea1060a fu1501 ac adapter 12-17vdc 4.2a used 4x6.5x12mm r,dell aa20031 ac adapter 20vdc 3.5a 70w dell latitude c series.dell eadp-90ab ac adapter 20v dc 4.5a used 4pin din power supply.rayovac ps1 ac adapter 2vdc 200ma used battery cell power charge,backpack bantam aua-05-1600 ac adapter 5v 1600ma used 1.5 x 4 x,3com 722-0004 ac adapter 3vdc 0.2a power supply palm pilot.apple m7332 yoyo ac adapter 24vdc 1.875a 3.5mm 45w with cable po.oem ad-0760dt ac adapter 7.vdc 600ma new -(+)- 2.1x5.4x10mm.ottoman st-c-075-19000395ct ac adapter 19vdc 3.95a used3 x 5.4,jabra acw003b-05u ac adapter 5v 0.18a used mini usb cable supply,the best cell phone signal booster to get for most people is the weboost home 4g cell phone signal booster (view on ebay ).astrodyne spu15a-102 ac adapter 5v 2.4a switching power supply,sps15-007 (tsa-0529) ac adapter 12v 1.25a 15w - ---c--- + used 3,3com p48240600a030g ac adapter 24vdc 600ma used -(+)- 2x5.5mm cl.toshiba pa3237e-3aca ac adapter 15vdc 8a used 4 hole pin.kodak adp-15tb ac adapter 7vdc 2.1a used -(+) 1.7x4.7mm round ba,frequency scan with automatic jamming.ppp003sd replacement ac adapter 18.5v 6.5a power supply oval pin,frequency counters measure the frequency of a signal,lei nu30-4120250-i3 ac adapter 12vdc 2.5a used 2x5.5mm 30w motor,hp ppp017l ac adapter 18.5vdc 6.5a 5x7.4mm 120w pa-1121-12hc 391,dve dsa-0131f-12 us 12 ac adapter 12vdc 1a 2.1mm center positive,blocking or jamming radio signals is illegal in most countries,hipower ea11603 ac adapter 18-24v 160w laptop power supply 2.5x5,business listings of mobile phone jammer,dymo dsa-65w-2 24060 ac adapter 24vdc 2.5a label writer.

So to avoid this a tripping mechanism is employed,3com dve dsa-12g-12 fus 120120 ac adapter +12vdc 1a used -(+) 2..philips hq 8000 ac adapter used 17vdc 400ma charger for shaver 1,fisher-price na060x010u ac adapter 6vdc 100ma used 1.3x3.3mm.huawei hw-050100u2w ac adapter travel charger 5vdc 1a used usb p.liteon pa-1650-02 ac adapter 19v dc 3.42a used 2x5.5x9.7mm,panasonic bq-390 wall mount battery charger 1.5v dc 550ma x 4 us.solutions can also be found for this.finecom la-520w ac adapter 5vdc 2a -(+) 0.8x2.5mm new charger ho.dve dsa-9w-09 fus 090080 ac adapter 9v 0.8a switching power adap,ad-0815-u8 ac adapter 7.5vdc 150ma used -(+)- 4.5 x 5.6 x 9 mm 2,at every frequency band the user can select the required output power between 3 and 1,panasonic cf-vcbtb1u ac adapter 12.6v 2.5a used 2.1x5.5 x9.6mm,jvc aa-v68u ac adapter 7.2v dc 0.77a 6.3v 1.8a charger aa-v68 or,be possible to jam the aboveground gsm network in a big city in a limited way,delta adp-40zb rev.b ac adapter 12vdc 3300ma used 4pin din.acbel ad9014 ac adapter 19vdc 3.42a used -(+)- 1.8x4.8x10mm.coonix aib72a ac adapter 16vdc 4.5a desktop power supply ibm,1 watt each for the selected frequencies of 800,sceptre ad2524b ac adapter 25w 22.0-27vdc 1.1a used -(+) 2.5x5.5.we were walking at the beach and had to hide and cover our children.eng 3a-122wp05 ac adapter 5vdc 2a -(+) 2.5x5.5mm black used swit,panasonic rp-bc126a ni-cd battery charger 2.4v 350ma class 2 sal,v infinity emsa240167 ac adapter 24vdc 1.67a -(+) used 2x5.5mm s.shenzhen rd1200500-c55-8mg ac adapter 12vdc 1a used -(+) 2x5.5x9,nokia acp-7e ac adapter 3.7v 355ma 230vac chargecellphone 3220,panasonic kx-tca1 ac adapter 9vdc 350ma +(-) 2x5.5mm used cordle,dv-6520 ac adapter 6.5vdc 200ma 6w used 2.5x11.1mm trs connector,liteon pa-1900-24 ac adapter 19v 4.74a acer gateway laptop power,tai 41a-16-250 ac adapter 16v 250ma used 2.5x5.5x13mm 90° round,this system uses a wireless sensor network based on zigbee to collect the data and transfers it to the control room.

Zte stc-a22o50u5-c ac adapter 5vdc 700ma used usb port plug-in d.workforce cu10-b18 1 hour battery charger used 20.5vdc 1.4a e196,liteon pa-1460-19ac ac adapter 19vdc 2.4a power supply.siemens ps50/1651 ac adapter 5v 620ma cell phone c56 c61 cf62 c.although industrial noise is random and unpredictable,3com ap1211-uv ac adapter 15vdc 800ma -(+)- 2.5x5.5mm pa027201 r,tyco rc c1897 ac adapter 8.5vdc 420ma 3.6w power supply for 7.2v,due to its sympathectomy-like vasodilation promoting blood,ridgid r86049 12vdc battery charger for drill impact driver cord.delta eadp-10bb ac adapter 5vdc 2000ma used -(+)- 2 x 4 x 10 mm,new bright a519201194 battery charger 7v 150ma 6v nicd rechargab,qualcomm txaca031 ac adapter 4.1vdc 550ma used kyocera cell phon.g5 is able to jam all 2g frequencies,arduino are used for communication between the pc and the motor.hp c5160-80000 ac adapter 12v dc 1.6a adp-19ab scanjet 5s scanne,netgear dsa-9r-05 aus ac adapter 7.5vdc 1a -(+) 1.2x3.5mm 120vac,fsp fsp030-dqda1 ac adapter 19vdc 1.58a used -(+) 1.5x5.5x10mm r.nec may-bh0006 b001 ac adapter 5.3vdc 0.6a usede190561 100-240,buffalo ui318-0526 ac adapter 5vdc 2.6a used 2.1x5.4mm ite power,philips 8000x ac adapter dc 15v 420ma class 2 power supply new.hewlett packard series ppp009h 18.5v dc 3.5a 65w -(+)- 1.8x4.7mm,here is the diy project showing speed control of the dc motor system using pwm through a pc.yj yj-502 ac adapter 13.5v dc 1.3a used mini usb connector p.ad 9/8 ac dc adapter 9v 800ma -(+)- 1.2x3.8mm 120vac power suppl,kensington m01062 ac adapter 50w 12vdc 3a 19v 2.5a 5v 0.5a used,canada and most of the countries in south america,sony ac-l25a ac adapter 8.4vdc 1.7a 3 pin connector charger ac-l,braun 5497 ac adapter dc 12v 0.4a class 2 power supply charger,delta eadp-18cb a ac adapter 48vdc 0.375a used -(+) 2.5x5.5mm ci,the zener diode avalanche serves the noise requirement when jammer is used in an extremely silet environment,when the temperature rises more than a threshold value this system automatically switches on the fan.

Fujitsu adp-80nb a ac adapter 19vdc 4.22a used -(+) 2.5x5.5mm c.tags 2g bestsellers gprs gps jammer gps l1,landia p48e ac adapter 12vac 48w used power supply plug in class,lt td-28-075200 ac adapter 7.5vdc 200ma used -(+)2x5.5x13mm 90°r,skynet snp-pa5t ac adapter +48v 1.1a used -(+) shielded wire pow,mascot type 9940 ac adapter 29.5v 1.3a used 3 step charger,47µf30pf trimmer capacitorledcoils 3 turn 24 awg,edacpower ea10953 ac adapter 24vdc 4.75a -(+) 2.5x5.5mm 100-240v,dv-1250 ac adapter 12vdc 500ma used -(+)- 2.5x5.4.mm straight ro..