Gps jammer with hackrf software , gps jammer Waterloo

Analysis of Signal Tracking Techniques for Multipath Mitigation By Antonio Fernández, Mariano Wis, Pau Closas, Carles Fernández-Prades, José A. García, Francesca Zanier, and Massimo Crisci INNOVATION INSIGHTS by Richard Langley GETTING RID OF A NUISANCE. No, I’m not talking about your neighbor’s barking dog or the IT guy when he shows up to fiddle, yet again, with your computer. I’m talking about multipath. What is multipath, you ask? Herewith, Multipath 101. When a radio signal travels from a transmitting antenna to a receiving antenna, it will follow a direct line-of-sight path. But the signal might also travel to the receiving antenna after being reflected off a nearby building, say, resulting in a delayed signal or echo along with the line-of-sight one. Those of us of a certain age will remember ghost images on the screens of TVs connected to “rabbit ears” or outdoor antennas. That was multipath. These days, with TV signals primarily delivered by cable and satellite, we don’t see multipath much anymore. But we do hear it in our cars, from time to time, while listening to FM radio. Although the FM “capture effect” provides some margin against multipath, it is not uncommon to lose stereo reception or to experience fading out of the signal while driving in built-up areas as a result of reflections. This same multipath phenomenon also affects GNSS signals. Unlike satellite TV antennas, the antennas feeding our GNSS receivers are omnidirectional. So we have the possibility of not only receiving a direct, line-of-sight signal from a GNSS satellite but also any indirect signal from the satellite that gets reflected off nearby buildings or other objects or even the ground. The related phenomena of diffraction and scattering can also generate multipath signals. In a GNSS receiver, the line-of-sight and multipath signals combine to corrupt tracking of the line-of-sight signal resulting in increased pseudorange and carrier-phase measurement errors. GNSS antenna and receiver manufacturers have developed techniques to minimize some of the impact of multipath on the GNSS observables. And tracking of some of the newer GNSS signals is a bit more resistant to multipath. But multipath, at some level, is still a problem looking for a better solution. This brings us to ARTEMISA, which stands for Advanced Receiver Techniques: Multiprocessing Algorithms. It’s a European initiative to develop techniques to minimize the effects of multipath in GNSS receivers. For those of you who are a little rusty on your Greek mythology, Artemis (or Artemisa in Spanish — after all, she was a woman) was the Greek goddess of the hunt. You might better know her Roman equivalent: Diana. Her parents were Zeus and Leto, and Apollo was her twin brother. She is often depicted carrying a bow and arrows. How appropriate a name for a project whose goal is to try to kill off the effects of multipath in GNSS receivers. In this month’s column, the team of researchers involved with ARTEMISA describe their efforts to generate synthetic multipath for GPS L1 and Galileo E1 signals and to test different signal tracking techniques in a simulated receiver to see which techniques best minimize the effects of multipath on positioning solutions and which might be feasible candidates for incorporating in real receivers. The hunt is on. GNSS navigation in urban environments is usually challenged by a number of effects such as multipath and weak signal conditions. In particular, the pernicious effects of multipath on signal tracking and system accuracy are widely known. To mitigate these effects, there is a series of techniques that range from modified antenna design to combining the GNSS receiver with other sensors or subsystems. Another possibility is to implement advanced tracking techniques specifically designed for these purposes. Such techniques usually impose computational load and implementation complexity, which make them hard to implement in an application-specific-integrated-circuit-based receiver. However, given the current advances in computer technology and the possibilities of field-programmable-gate-array- (FPGA-)based hardware, it is possible to implement these new techniques in an operational receiver. We have studied this possibility as part of the ARTEMISA project, carried out by DEIMOS Space and the Centre Tecnològic de Telecomunicacions de Catalunya, and supervised by the European Space Agency’s European Space Research and Technology Centre. We have implemented and tested a series of innovative techniques that are able to cope with, and even to estimate, multipath (MP) parameters, using a simulated software receiver based on the GRANADA (Galileo Receiver Analysis and Design Application) GNSS blockset for MathWork’s Simulink graphical programming language tool. These techniques are based on the maximum likelihood principle (as implemented in the Multipath Estimating Delay Lock Loop) or on online Bayesian techniques for the estimation of multipath (as implemented in the Multipath Estimating Particle Filter), involving architectural modifications of the tracking loops (as in vector tracking loops), or even constituting a new paradigm in receiver design (direct position estimation). Our effort in this project has focused on two main tasks. The first task is the design and development of the simulation platform, the techniques to be tested, and a multipath model representative of the urban environment. The second task involves a simulation campaign that has been carried out to test the different techniques and to contrast the results obtained against the legacy delay lock loop / phase lock loop (DLL/PLL) tracking loop schemes. This article describes these tasks and some of the results we have obtained so far. Keep in mind that at the time of writing, ARTEMISA is still ongoing. Therefore, more results are expected up until the end of the project. Simulation Platform The simulation platform has been developed in Matlab/Simulink with DEIMOS Engenharia’s GRANADA GNSS Blockset. This blockset is a collection of Simulink models and blocks that can be used to design and simulate any kind of GNSS receiver. The main block is the Factor Correlator Model (FCM), which implements the set of correlators through an analytical (set of equations) model. Carrier phase, code misalignment, autocorrelation function, and even the correlated noise and the multipath at the output of every virtual correlator are simulated for a given input trajectory. On the other hand, the tracking loops are implemented as independent modules representative of an actual receiver. This semi-analytical approach has the advantage of performing a fast simulation of the correlator output without the need for implementing the baseband correlation operation. In addition, its implementation in Simulink allows for the development of innovative tracking schemes. This approach also matches with the ARTEMISA project concept, where a series of innovative tracking loops has been implemented with the aim of replacing or improving conventional PLL/DLL schemes. The main architecture of the simulation platform is shown in FIGURE 1. We use an external trajectory file to generate the reference data that will be used with the FCM block to generate the correlator output that will feed the tracking loop blocks. These trajectory files are also used to feed the multipath scenario generators, to test each technique under a number of defined scenarios so that we can assess their performances and find their limitations under multipath. Figure 1. ARTEMISA simulation platform architecture. We used two statistical models for the description of the signal propagation: the Controlled Stochastic Channel Model (CSCM), which is a modification of the Land Mobile Satellite channel developed by Pérez-Fontán, and the well-known Land Mobile Channel Model, developed by the German Aerospace Center (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt or DLR); see Further Reading. These models generate a series of scenario files, which can be loaded into the FCM to introduce the multipath effects in the correlator output. These two statistical models are complementary. The CSCM model allows the user to set the multipath channel characteristics to be able to stress the tracking technique, while the DLR model permits evaluation of the technique’s response in realistic conditions. A deterministic user-defined multipath generator was implemented to check the response of the tracking techniques under well-defined multipath conditions. The Multipath Error Envelope (MPEE) was also computed to evaluate the response of the technique under one echo with varying delay conditions. The purpose of this article is not to explain all the developments performed with the platform. It focuses on the results obtained with the deterministic and statistical channel model. For this reason, the development of the CSCM generator will be explained in detail. Controlled Stochastic Channel Model The CSCM module was specifically created for this project. Its purpose is to generate a stochastic channel, but with the capability to control the multipath power levels and the number of echoes generated in the scenario, thus creating a set of realistic multipath signals, but with the capability of being easily controlled by the user. Time series for multipath echoes are generated, following a Rice or Rayleigh stochastic model, but the mean power levels, the amplification K factors, and the power switching times are chosen by the user. The model allows the selection of the number of satellites (channels) that are generated in the model, the sampling period (related to the loop integration time), the length of the simulation, the receiver speed, the signal carrier frequency, and channel specific parameters such as the number of echoes, the average delay of the echoes and the decay slope (echo power loss ratio with signal delay). One of the parameters the user can set implicitly is the multipath echo lifetime. What the user really sets is the channel transition time, or the time during which the channel keeps the multipath configuration. Every time the transition time is changed, a series of multipath echoes are canceled and other ones appear. This set of disappearing/appearing echoes is performed in pairs in such a way that the transition between echoes is smooth. FIGURE 2 illustrates this mechanism. Figure 2. CSCM echoes smooth transition. When an echo is disappearing (a red one in the figure), its associated echo is at its maximum value (a blue scatterer). In the next interval, a new echo appears in a different delay position (a green one) and the associated scatterer begins to decrease its power. This mechanism allows the user to easily associate the transition time to half the multipath echo lifetime. Simulation Plan The simulation plan is structured into different stages. The first stage of the simulation plan is based on the controlled multipath environment, with specific tests for each technique. The purpose of this stage is the tuning up of the techniques. As an example, for the Multipath Estimating Delay Lock Loop (MEDLL) technique, parameters such as the precorrelation bandwidth, the number of MEDLL iterations or the number of assumed multipath echoes are parameters that are adjusted after these tests are carried out. Another purpose of this first stage is to check the performance of the techniques under deterministic, fully controlled multipath. Parameters like signal-to-multipath ratio, multipath delay, and the number of multipath echoes can be controlled at any time. Another test is the generation of the multipath envelope error plot. The utility of this test is to find the optimal configuration of the correlator position for each kind of signal, which is a trade-off between the obtained root-mean-square error (RMSE) and the number of correlators. This procedure is repeated for each signal considered in the plan. The next stage of the simulation plan is the test with the CSCM model. This test consists of the generation of a series of scenarios characterized by the stochastic model, the number of echoes, and the user receiver dynamics. Scenarios presented in this article are shown in TABLE 1. Two types of user environments are defined: one for pedestrian and one for vehicular receivers. The dynamics (user speed) define the integration (sampling time) and the multipath Doppler spread. The stochastic model parameters include the type of stochastic model for the line-of-sight signal (LOSS) and multipath echoes, mean power level, and amplification K factor. These scenarios represent a moderate multipath level with four echoes. Table 1. CSCM scenarios in the simulation plan. Each scenario was run with different settings of carrier-to-noise-density ratio (C/N0) and with all the signals that were planned for the project: GPS L1 C/A, GPS L5, Galileo E1 and Galileo E5. In this article, we focus on L1 band signals, analyzing the results for GPS L1 and Galileo E1. Table 2. GNSS signals considered in the analysis. The final stage in the simulation plan is testing each technique under realistic channel conditions with the DLR model. In this case, an urban scenario is set, assuming two types of receiver dynamics (a pedestrian user and a vehicular user). No more details about this stage are given because these tests are currently ongoing. Technique Descriptions After an initial evaluation of the candidate techniques, the following techniques were selected for implementation and testing in the project. Multipath Estimating Delay Lock Loop. MEDLL was proposed by Van Nee (see Further Reading). It is a robust statistical approach to the multipath problem, where the maximum likelihood principle is applied to a signal model consisting of LOSS and M-1 multipath rays or echoes. The key idea is to perform the estimation of the whole set of parameters of the incoming signals (that is, amplitude, delay, and phase) in an iterative manner. When their amplitudes, time delays, and carrier phases are estimated, the effect of the reflections in the correlation can be removed. Applying standard assumptions, the maximization of the likelihood function yields a set of interrelated equations from which one can estimate iteratively the LOSS and multipath parameters. The implementation of MEDLL considers a similar architecture as conventional DLLs, although in practice more than three correlators per loop are required for effective multipath mitigation. Despite its demanding requirements in terms of a large number of correlators and computational load, MEDLL was successfully implemented in NovAtel receivers because of its excellent performance in multipath mitigation. The contributions of all signals (that is, LOSS and an unknown number of echoes) are not calculated simultaneously from the outset. First, the contribution of only one signal is calculated, then the contribution of a second signal is added with the contributions of both signals being optimized, then the contribution of a third signal is added and the contributions of all three signals are optimized, and so on. The process is repeated until a suitable stop criterion is fulfilled. A possible approach for deciding when to stop adding more rays to the signal model is to detect when the error increases; that is, observing that the signal-to-residual ratio when considering an extra path decreases with respect to the case of not considering it, or reaching a maximum number of considered paths, which is a design parameter of this technique. Multipath Estimating Particle Filter. The MEPF shares with MEDLL the philosophy of estimating the parameters of multipath to mitigate its effect. The main difference is that in this case the statistical principle is not the ML (as in MEDLL) but Bayesian filtering. Here the term Bayesian means that the algorithm is using some sort of a priori information regarding these parameters (such as interdependencies and time evolution models). Therefore, instead of assuming that each integration period is independent of the others, a first-order Markov process is assumed for the unknown parameters (that is, amplitude, delay, and phase). The resulting problem is formulated as a nonlinear state-space model and can be solved by means of a Rao-Blackwellized particle filtering method. The MEPF has a relatively high computational load, which is a function of the number of particles (Np), the number of correlation points, and the number of rays to be estimated (M). In all cases, the larger the values the more computationally demanding the algorithm is. According to the simulations performed, configurations with Np larger than 2000 are not worthwhile, because it implies a high computational cost and the results do not improve significantly the accuracy of a GNSS receiver. Also notice that the dimension of the state-space to be estimated is 3 × M ([amplitude, phase, delay] × M), and thus estimating an additional multipath ray implies augmenting the dimensionality by three. Theoretically, the convergence results of particle filters are independent of the dimensionality of the problem. However, it is agreed that in practice these methods fail when the problem increases in dimension. Therefore, setting M larger than 5 is not reasonable since the number of particles required for convergence would be too large to consider its implementation in a receiver. Vector Tracking Loops. A conventional GNSS receiver consists of several parallel scalar DLLs, each of which independently estimates the individual pseudoranges. The parallel set of measured pseudoranges (plus Doppler or accumulated delta range measurements on the carrier) are then fed to a Kalman filter estimator, and thus each DLL effectively produces an independent estimate for each of the N pseudoranges for each of the N satellites. However, not all of their measurements are truly independent, although they are treated as such by the DLL, and if there are more than four measurements being made and four or fewer unknowns, the system is overdetermined. Furthermore, the geometry of the satellite-user paths generally prevents the measurements from being truly independent. The concept of vector tracking loops firstly appeared in the early 1980s. Recently, the method has attracted the attention of many researchers (see Further Reading) due to its good performance in weak signal scenarios. In this article, we present the implementation of a vector tracking loop that works with pseudorange and pseudorange-rate measurements and provides estimations for position, velocity, receiver clock error, and receiver clock drift. The vector loop has been integrated in a basic receiver based on the classical DLL and PLL/frequency lock loop (FLL)-assisted architecture, acting as an overlay procedure, which activates automatically once the basic receiver has obtained the first position fix. Then, the position/velocity/time solution is used to jointly estimate the synchronization parameters (time delay and carrier phase) for each of the received GNSS signals by means of an extended Kalman filter, and those values are re-injected into the tracking loop. By using position for deriving such synchronization parameters, the algorithm exploits the problem’s inherent geometric constraints, processing all the channels jointly and providing robustness in scenarios with weak receiving power, high multipath, or fast fading. Direct Position Estimation. Although the conventional two-step position determination is the approach taken traditionally, it is seen to have a number of drawbacks. In contrast, direct position estimation (DPE for short) proposes an alternative where the estimation of a user’s position is performed directly from the received and sampled signal, thus avoiding intermediate steps and jointly considering signals from all satellites when estimating the position solution. By merging the two-step approach into a single estimation problem, DPE addresses some of the inherent drawbacks of the conventional approach where the dependencies between channels are efficiently exploited, in the sense that signals from visible satellites are jointly processed to obtain the user’s position. At the time of writing, this technique is being implemented and its analysis is left for future publications. Results Not all the results that we have obtained have been included in this article; only the most relevant ones for L1/E1 CBOC and BPSK signals are given. MEDLL. Optimal Correlator Configuration. As stated previously, the test consisted of executing different correlator configurations. TABLE 3 shows the correlator configuration ID, the number of correlation samples, and the location of the late correlators with respect to the prompt one and normalized to the chip time (Tc). The corresponding early samples are defined analogously. For all these configurations, it is assumed that there is a correlator at zero chips. Table 3. MEDLL correlator configurations tested. These configurations were selected in order to test different possibilities as regular spacing between correlators (MP31, MP61, or MP91), setting the correlators to inflexion points of the autocorrelation function (ACF) (NC37 or NC43 for CBOC modulation), or variable spacing (as configurations AR01 to AR05 and GE01) that optimize the number of correlators. The results of the tests can be observed in FIGURE 3 for a BPSK(1) signal and for a CBOC(6,1,1/11) signal. Figure 3. MPEE for MEDLL with BPSK and CBOC signals for different correlator configurations (Tc=chip time). In general, it is observed that the greater the number of correlators, the smaller is the spacing and therefore, the area covered by the multipath error envelope is smaller. However, the greater the number of correlators, the greater is the processing time. Therefore, it is necessary to find an optimal configuration that best fits the multipath variation. After having analyzed the tests for these configurations, we found that the optimal configurations are AR01 for the BPSK signal and NC37 for the CBOC(6,1,1/11) signal. These configurations are shown in FIGUR 4, and were used for the remaining tests. Figure 4. Correlator configurations for CBOC and BPSK signals. CSCM. As mentioned in the simulation plan description, the tests for a pedestrian and a vehicular user in a moderate multipath environment were performed with a scenario file generated with the CSCM tool. These scenarios are characterized by a series of multipath echo levels, number of echoes, and specific stochastic models that are detailed in Table 1. In this table, the pedestrian scenario is known as SP1 and the vehicular scenario is shown as SV1. The results with these scenarios are presented in this article. The RMSE for range estimates in these scenarios is shown in FIGURE 5 for SP1 and SV1. For comparison, these plots show also the theoretical lower bound (Nunes bound) computed for each technique. Figure 5. Range RMSE for MEDLL in pedestrian and vehicular scenarios. The plots show that MEDLL outperforms the conventional DLL results above a minimum C/N0 value. This happens beyond 32 dB-Hz for a CBOC signal and 35 dB-Hz for a BPSK(1) signal for low dynamics (pedestrian) environments. In the case of vehicle scenarios such as SV1, it is observed that it requires significantly higher values of C/N0 in order to outperform the DLL RMSE. This result makes the technique impractical for vehicular applications. Time Performance. A collateral result that has been obtained with CSCM scenarios is the time performance of the technique, compared to the legacy DLL/PLL scheme. The ratios of the execution times needed for the techniques have been computed. This is an indicative measure of the computational load.  The time performance of MEDLL with the selected correlator configuration against DLL is 10:1. That is, 10 times more time is required for the MEDLL technique than the DLL to run the same scenario. It is also observed that the ratio for BPSK modulation is slightly larger than the ratio for the CBOC signal, because more correlators are used in that case. MEPF. Performance Under Controlled Channel. FIGURE 6 shows an example of the performance of the MEPF technique tested in a controlled channel environment. Figure 6. Results of the MEPF in the controlled multipath environment with 2 and 3 estimated rays including the line-of-sight. For comparison purposes, DLL/PLL results are also included (blue line in upper plot). It can be observed how the DLL/PLL technique has an error, which grows as the number of rays is increased. However, when the MEPF is applied, it can be observed how the technique is capable of dealing with a multipath-changing environment despite the fact that it is varying in time with the number of rays increasing. It can also be noticed that the response of the technique is practically the same independent of the number of estimated rays (M). These results were achieved with a BPSK signal and 500 particles. Covariance Matrix Adjustment. Before starting the specific test for the evaluation of the scenario performance, it is necessary to calibrate the particle filter. The calibration procedure consists of the adjustment of the process covariance matrix. The observation covariance can be adjusted, simply by analyzing the raw observables, or it can even be done automatically. The critical point is the adjustment of the states’ covariance. It has been observed that an improper adjustment of the covariance may cause an increment in the range RMSE or even the divergence of the filter. For that reason, a systematic procedure for the adjustment of the covariance matrix has been followed. This procedure evaluates the performance using different configurations of the covariance matrices of the line-of-sight and multipath parameters in two stages, and allows us to find a set of optimal values for each scenario. Optimal Correlator Configuration. We also analyzed the optimal correlator configuration for the MEPF technique. A number of configurations in Table 3 were used under CSCM scenarios. It was found that the correlator configuration does not have a strong influence on the performance of the MEPF technique. It is worth mentioning that in cases where fewer than five correlators were used, the performance degraded. Despite the weak influence of the range RMSE with the correlator configuration, it was observed that there is a minimum for the BPSK signal that can be chosen for the MEPF technique (MP31). For the CBOC signal, the same configuration used for MEDLL is finally chosen (NC37), provided that it is the optimal configuration that balances range RMSE and the number of correlators. Number of Particles. It is important to notice that an initial set of tests was performed with 500 particles. However, it was found that by increasing the number of particles to 2000, the performance of the technique with CSCM was remarkably better. Because of this, for the remaining tests using the CSCM, this number of particles was the default value. Using a higher number is not worthwhile since results are not much improved and the computational load becomes too high. CSCM Results. The range RMSE results for the pedestrian scenario SP1 with the MEPF technique are shown in FIGURE 7. In this case, it is observed that for the CBOC signal, MEPF outperforms the DLL/PLL technique for low C/N0 values. This result could not be reproduced for the BPSK signal because of the adjustment of the covariance matrix, which in this test was optimized for CBOC. Figure 7. Range RMSE for MEPF and pedestrian scenario. These promising results for CBOC open the possibility of using this technique in applications where the LOSS is very weak or where the multipath signals are very strong. More tests with this technique are currently being executed for a better adjustment of covariance settings for BPSK. Time Performance. The previous time performance analysis was performed with the MEPF technique. The performance ranges among 180:1 and 340:1, when compared to DLL/PLL schemes using three correlation samples. The extremely long time required to simulate the scenario makes this technique inadvisable for implementation within an operational receiver using current technology. VTL. CSCM Results. The same CSCM scenarios were performed for the VTL technique, but using a multi-channel receiver. Results for pedestrian SP1 and vehicular SV1 scenarios are shown in FIGURE 8. Figure 8. Position RMSE for VTL with pedestrian and vehicular scenarios. It must be noted that, in order to perform fair comparisons, the results of ordinary DLL/PLL tracking used a conventional KF for the computation of the position instead of the least squares module available in the GRANADA GNSS Blockset. In our numerical simulations, a significant improvement in the performance of VTL with respect to the DLL/PLL+KF scheme was not observed in pedestrian environments, due to the low dynamics. Under those dynamic conditions, both systems exhibited similar (statistically equivalent) behavior. In the case of scenario SV1, the velocity applied to the receiver was higher than in the pedestrian case, and the VTL exhibited a remarkable improvement over the DLL/PLL+KF-based receiver. For the BPSK modulation, it was observed that for low values of C/N0 , the VTL performs better than DLL/PLL+KF. However, for stronger signals, both techniques have the same behavior as shown for the pedestrian scenario results. On the other hand, for the CBOC modulation, it is observed that VTL performs better than DLL/PLL+KF for the whole range of C/N0 values. The precorrelation bandwidth was set to 8 MHz in the case of BPSK, while for CBOC it was set to 14 MHz. That wider bandwidth of the CBOC receiver has an impact in the estimation of the measurements covariance matrix. In can be observed that in such higher dynamic stress conditions, the VTL outperformed DLL/PLL+KF in our numerical simulations. It must be mentioned that for all the simulations, we assumed the same C/N0 for all satellites. However, we plan to run tests with LOSS fading (variation of C/N0). It is expected that the VTL technique will show its advantage in those simulations. It was also observed that settings of the KF covariance have an important effect on the results. This covariance must be adjusted according to the multipath signal level. Therefore, a calibration operation, which adapts the KF to a particular scenario should be performed. While the measurement covariance matrix can be adaptively estimated from the output of the DLLs and the PLLs, the process covariance matrix should be adjusted depending on the trajectory characteristics. Time Performance. The time performance analysis also shows that the time performances of VTL and DLL/PLL+KF are very similar. Only a small increment of 15% of the computational cost for vehicular scenarios has been observed. This makes this technique a good candidate to be implemented in an operational software-based receiver. Results Overview After analyzing the current results from the different techniques, some general conclusions on their performance can be made. MEDLL can be useful to mitigate and improve the pseudorange measurement provided that the C/N0 value is greater than a threshold value. An intuitive reasoning for this is that the estimation of multipath rays is easier at high C/N0 values. Below this value, the MEDLL technique does not present an important advantage over ordinary DLL/PLL given the time performance it has (a ratio of 10:1). MEDLL is especially well-suited for static and pedestrian environments. MEPF is a technique that still needs research before it can be used operatively. Results show that it works quite well for low C/N0 values when compared to DLL/PLL. Results show that for the CBOC signal, at least 2000 particles are needed to give good results for low C/N0 values. However, its time performance is very poor (around 200:1 with respect to DLL with 2000 particles) VTL does not present an advantage in the pseudorange measurement domain, but it clearly improves the position solution with respect to a classical DLL/PLL+KF tracker. This improvement is remarkable under dynamic conditions. It is also observed that the time performance is very similar to the DLL/PLL+KF one. Therefore this technique is a good candidate for implementation in a receiver prototype based on embedded hardware, an FPGA implementation, or software-based radio. For the sake of completeness, a performance comparison in the range domain of the different techniques with the BPSK and CBOC signals for the pedestrian SP1 scenario are presented in FIGURE 9. The metric used is the range RMSE. Figure 9. Compared range RMSE for different techniques: pedestrian scenario with BPSK(1) and CBOC(6,1,1/11) signals. Conclusions and Future Work This article has presented a series of innovative multipath-estimating techniques using non-conventional approaches in the tracking algorithms. These non-conventional approaches are based on maximum likelihood (MEDLL) or non-linear online filtering algorithms (MEPF). Alternative approaches in the positioning algorithms have also been analyzed (VTL and DPE). To check the performance of these techniques, we have developed a simulation platform, able to carry out deterministic multipath simulations, in which the multipath environment can be controlled deterministically, and stochastic simulations based on tested multipath models (CSCM and DLR). The CSCM model is capable of simulating realistic multipath environments but with the capability to control the multipath ray parameters and the number of these rays. The DLR model allows us to perform simulations based on the conditions in realistic urban environments. This article has focused on the CSCM model. It shows simulations for a pedestrian and a vehicular scenario that represent typical dynamic conditions for each kind of user. These results show that the MEDLL technique performs very well in a static multipath environment under low dynamics with good visibility conditions. Concerning the MEPF, it has been found that the adjustment of the covariance for the observables is very important for achieving good results for the range RMSE. If this adjustment is done well, the results for low values of C/N0 outperform the ordinary DLL/PLL technique. This adjustment has been successfully achieved for a CBOC signal, but a BPSK signal still requires additional work. This may open the possibility of using this technique in applications in which the LOSS is very weak. It has also been observed that the VTL technique is very effective in high dynamics applications and noisy environments, provided that the internal KF process noise covariance has been properly estimated. VTL also shows a performance very similar to the DLL/PLL+KF scheme in mild-condition scenarios. That makes this technique a good candidate for implementation in a real-time software-based receiver. Finally, it is necessary to remark that ARTEMISA is still a work in progress. An extensive simulation campaign in a realistic urban environment under different conditions using the DLR multipath model is ongoing. In addition to the techniques presented in this article, other advanced techniques such as direct position estimation are under evaluation. Acknowledgments The ARTEMISA project, funded by the European Space Agency (ESA) is being carried out by DEIMOS Space, with the Centre Tecnològic de Telecomunicacions de Catalunya as subcontractor. The content of the present article reflects solely the authors’ views and by no means represents official ESA policy. The authors of this article would like to thank Tiago Peres, Joao Silva, and Pedro Silva from DEIMOS Engenharia; José Antonio Pulido from DEIMOS Space; and Roberto Prieto-Cerdeira from ESA’s European Space Research and Technology Centre for their support in the adaptation of the GRANADA GNSS Blockset and the simulation platform to the requirements of the techniques and multipath environments tested in the project. ANTONIO FERNANDEZ co-founded DEIMOS Space with headquarters in Madrid, in 2001, where he is currently in charge of the GNSS Business Unit. MARIANO WIS is currently working for DEIMOS Space as a project engineer in the GNSS Business Unit. He is also a Ph.D. candidate in the Aerospace Science and Technology Program of Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya in Barcelona. PAU CLOSAS is a senior research associate and head of the Statistical Interference Department in the Communications Systems Division of the Centre Tecnològic de Telecomunicacions de Catalunya (CTTC) in Barcelona. CARLES FERNANDEZ–PRADES is serving as head of the Communications Systems Division at CTTC, where he holds a position as senior researcher. JOSE A. GARCIA is with the Radio Navigation Systems and Techniques Section at the European Space Agency’s European Space Research and Technology Centre (ESA/ESTEC) in Noordwijk, The Netherlands. FRANCESCA ZANIER is also with the ESA/ESTEC Radio Navigation Systems and Techniques Section. MASSIMO CRISCI is the head of the ESA/ESTEC Radio Navigation Systems and Techniques Section. FURTHER READING • ARTEMISA “ARTEMISA: New GNSS Receiver Processing Techniques for Positioning and Multipath Mitigation” by A.J. Fernandez, J.A. Pulido, M. Wis, F. Zanier, R. Prieto-Cerdeira, M. Crisci, P. Closas, and C. Fernández-Prades in Proceedings of Navitec 2012, the 6th ESA Workshop on Satellite Navigation Technologies, and the European Workshop on GNSS Signals and Signal Processing, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, December 5–7, 2012, doi: 10.1109/NAVITEC.2012.6423092. • GRANADA GNSS Blockset “Factored Correlator Model: A Solution for Fast, Flexible, and Realistic GNSS Receiver Simulations” by J.S. Silva, P.F. Silva, A. Fernández, J. Diez, and J.F.M. Lorga in Proceedings of ION GNSS 2007, the 20th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Fort Worth, Texas, September 25–28 2007, pp. 2676-2686. • Signal Propagation Statistical Models “A Location and Movement Dependent GNSS Multipath Error Model for Pedestrian Applications” by A. Steingass, A. Lehner, and F. Schubert in Proceedings of ION GNSS 2009, the 22nd International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, Savannah, Georgia, September 22–25, 2009, pp. 2284-2296. “Statistical Modeling of the LMS Channel” by F.P. Fontan, M. Vazquez-Castro, C.E. Cabado, J.P. Garcia, and E. Kubista in IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 50, No. 6, November 2001, pp. 1549–1567, doi: 10.1109/25.966585. • Multipath Estimating Delay Lock Loop “The Multipath Estimating Delay Lock Loop: Approaching Theoretical Accuracy Limits” by R.D.J. Van Nee, J. Siereveld, P. C. Fenton, and B. R. Townsend in Proceedings of PLANS 1994, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Position, Location and Navigation Symposium, Las Vegas, Nevada, April 11–15, 1994, pp. 246–251, doi: 10.1109/PLANS.1994.303320. • Multipath Estimating Particle Filter “Nonlinear Bayesian Tracking Loops for Multipath Mitigation” by P. Closas, C. Fernández-Prades, J. Diez, and D. de Castro in International Journal of Navigation and Observation, Vol. 2012, Article ID 359128, 15 pages, 2012, doi:10.1155/2012/359128. • Vector Tracking Loops Modeling and Performance Analysis of GPS Vector Tracking Algorithms by M. Lashley, Ph.D. dissertation, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, December 2009. “A VDLL Approach to GNSS Cell Positioning for Indoor Scenarios” by F.D. Nunes, F.M.G. Sousa, and N. Blanco-Delgado in Proceedings of ION GNSS 2009, the 22nd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation,  Savannah, Georgia, September 22–25, 2009, pp. 1690–1699. • Direct Position Estimation “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Position in GNSS” by P. Closas, C. Fernández-Prades, and J.A. Fernández-Rubio in IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Vol. 14, No. 15, May 2007, pp. 359-362, doi: 10.1109/LSP.2006.888360. • Some Previous Innovation Columns on Multipath Mitigation “Under Cover: Synthetic-Aperture GNSS Signal Processing” by T. Pany, N. Falk, B. Riedl, C. Stöber, J.O. Winkel, and F.-J. Schimpl in GPS World, Vol. 24, No. 9, September 2013, pp. 42–50. “Multipath Minimization Method: Mitigation Through Adaptive Filtering for Machine Automation Applications” by L. Serrano, D. Kim, and R.B. Langley in GPS World, Vol. 22, No. 7, July 2011, pp. 42–48. “Multipath Mitigation: How Good Can it Get With the New Signals?” by L.R. Weill, in GPS World, Vol. 14, No. 6, June 2003, pp. 106–113. “GPS Signal Multipath: A Software Simulator” by S.H. Byun, G.A. Hajj, and L.W. Young in GPS World, Vol. 13, No. 7, July 2002, pp. 40–49. “Conquering Multipath: The GPS Accuracy Battle” by L.R. Weill in GPS World, Vol. 8, No. 4, April 1997, pp. 59–66.  

gps jammer with hackrf software

Wtd-065180b0-k replacement ac adapter 18.5v dc 3.5a laptop power.ault t22-0509-001t03 ac adapter 9vac 0.5a us robotics used ~(~).provided there is no hand over.finecom sa106c-12 12vdc 1a replacement mu12-2120100-a1 power sup.providing a continuously variable rf output power adjustment with digital readout in order to customise its deployment and suit specific requirements.lighton pb-1200-1m01 ac adapter 5v 4a switching ac power supply,ad41-0601000du ac adapter 6vdc 1a 1000ma i.t.e. power supply,dell d220p-01 da-2 series ac adapter 12vdc 18a 220w 8pin molex e,exvision adn050750500 ac adapter 7.5vdc 500ma used -(+) 1.5x3.5x,delta adp-90cd db ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a used -(+)- 2x5.5x11mm.dell 0335a1960 ac adapter 19v dc 3.16a -(+)- used 3x5mm 90° ite,fujitsu computers siemens adp-90sb ad ac adapter 20vdc 4.5a used,delphi 41-6-1000d ac adapter 6vdc 1000ma skyfi skyfi2 xm radio.honor ads-7.fn-06 05008gpcu ac adapter 5v 1.5a switching power.motorola am509 ac adapter 4.4v dc 1.1 a power supply spn4278d,how a cell phone signal booster works,nec pa-1750-07 ac adapter 15vdc 5a adp80 power supply nec laptop.delta adp-90cd db ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a used -(+)- 1.5x5.5x11mm,delta adp-60bb ac dc adapter 19v 3.16a laptop power supply.just mobile 3 socket charger max 6.5a usb 1a 5v new in pack univ,toshiba pa3241u-1aca ac adapter 15vdc 3a -(+) 3x6.5mm 100v-200va,i have designed two mobile jammer circuits,3com 722-0004 ac adapter 3vdc 0.2a power supply palm pilot.black&decker versapak vp131 4.3v battery charger for versapak ba,which is used to test the insulation of electronic devices such as transformers.ottoman st-c-075-19000395ct ac adapter 19vdc 3.95a used3 x 5.4,dell da90ps0-00 ac adapter 19.5vdc 4.62a used 1 x 5 x 7.4 x 12.5,southwestern bell freedom phone 9a300u ac adapter 9vac 300ma.preventing them from receiving signals and ….ault t57-182200-j010g ac adapter 18v ac 2200ma used,jvc ap v14u ac adapter 11vdc 1a used flat proprietery pin digit.panasonic pqlv208 ac adapter 9vdc 350ma -(+)- used 1.7 x 4.7 x 9,a mobile jammer circuit is an rf transmitter,sharp ea-28a ac adapter 6vdc 300ma used 2x5.5x10mm round barrel.delta adp-51bb ac adapter 24vdc 2.3a 6pin 9mm mini din at&t 006-,matsushita etyhp127mm ac adapter 12vdc 1.65a 4pin switching powe,using this circuit one can switch on or off the device by simply touching the sensor.black&decker tce-180021u2 ac adapter 21.75vdc 210ma used 1x3.7mm,hp compaq ppp012d-s ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a used -(+) round barre.surecall's fusion2go max is the cell phone signal booster for you,symbol pa-303-01 ac adapter dc 12v 200ma used charging dock for,motorola plm4681a ac adapter 4vdc 350ma used -(+) 0.5x3.2x7.6mm.rim sps-015 ac adapter ite power supply.aps aps48ea-114 ac dc adapter 7.5v 1.5a power supply,5vdc 500ma ac adapter used car charger cigarate lighter 12vdc-24.toshiba liteon pa-1121-08 ac power adapter 19v 6.3afor toshiba,deer computer ad1605cw ac adapter 5.5vdc 2.3a power supply.oem ad-0930m ac adapter 9vdc 300ma -(+)- 2x5.5mm 120vac plug in,download the seminar report for cell phone jammer.mw mws2465w-1 ac adapter 15-24vdc 63w used straight round barrel.dell adp-70eb ac adapter 20vdc 3.5a 3pin pa-6 family 9364u for d.igo ps0087 dc auto airpower adapter 15-24vdc used no cable 70w,motomaster 11-1552-4 manual battery charger 6/12v dc 1a.motorola bc6lmvir01 class 2 radio battery charger used 11vdc 1.3.linksys ls120v15ale ac adapter 12vdc 1.5a used -(+) 2x5mm 100-24.5 ghz range for wlan and bluetooth.this project shows automatic change over switch that switches dc power automatically to battery or ac to dc converter if there is a failure,igo 6630076-0100 ac adapter 19.5vdc 90w max used 1.8x5.5x10.7mm,creative a9700 ac adapter9vdc 700ma used -(+)- 2x5.5mm 120vac,micro controller based ac power controller,fuji fujifilm ac-3vw ac adapter 3v 1.7a power supply camera,finecom zfxpa01500090 ac adapter 9vdc 1.5a -(+) 0.6x2.5mm used 9, ,hi capacity ea1050a-190 ac adapter 19vdc 3.16a used 5 x 6 x 11,medtronic pice-34a ac adapter 6v dc 35ma 1.1w battery chargerc.mgp f10603-c ac adapter 12v-14v dc 5-4.28a used 2.5 x 5.4 x 12.1.finecome tr70a15 ac adapter 15vdc 4.6a 6pins like new 122-000033,a low-cost sewerage monitoring system that can detect blockages in the sewers is proposed in this paper,magellan 730489-c ac car adapter used 0.8x3.4x7.9mm 90°round bar.dell adp-150eb b ac adapter 19.5v dc 7700ma power supply for ins,lenovo 42t5276 ac adapter 20vdc 4.5a 90w used -(+)- 5.6x7.8mm st,dell adp-50hh ac adapter 19vdc 2.64a used 0.5x5x7.5x12mm round b.arduino are used for communication between the pc and the motor.wahl s003hu0420060 ac adapter 4.2vdc 600ma for trimer switching,ibm pscv 360107a ac adapter 24vdc 1.5a used 4pin 9mm mini din 10.helps you locate your nearest pharmacy.asian micro ams am14 ac adapter +5v 1.5a +12v 0.25a power supply.

It can not only cut off all 5g 3g 4g mobile phone signals,finecom 34w-12-5 ac adapter 5vdc 12v 2a 6pin 9mm mini din dual v,coming data cp0540 ac adapter 5vdc 4a -(+) 1.2x3.5mm 100-240vac.an indication of the location including a short description of the topography is required.liteon pa-1650-02 ac adapter 19v dc 3.42a used 2x5.5x9.7mm.cell phone jammer and phone jammer.targus tg-ucc smart universal lithium-ion battery charger 4.2v o.hp hstnn-da16 ac adapter 19.5v dc 10.3a used 1x5x7.3x12.7mm.sony bc-7f ni-cd battery charger.solar energy measurement using pic microcontroller,curtis dvd8005 ac adapter 12vdc 2.7a 30w power supply,520-ps12v2a medical power supply 12v 2.5a with awm e89980-a sunf,hp hp-ok65b13 ac adapter 18.5vdc 3.5a used -(+) 1.5x4.7x11mm rou,this system is able to operate in a jamming signal to communication link signal environment of 25 dbs.elementech au1361202 ac adapter 12vdc 3a -(+) used2.4 x 5.5 x,reverse polarity protection is fitted as standard.fujitsu adp-80nb a ac adapter 19vdc 4.22a used -(+) 2.5x5.5mm c.basler electric be115230cab0020 ac adapter 5vac 30va a used,this paper uses 8 stages cockcroft –walton multiplier for generating high voltage,hp compaq ppp009l ac adapter 18.5vdc 3.5a used -(+) with pin ins,artesyn ssl40-3360 ac adapter +48vdc 0.625a used 3pin din power.ii mobile jammermobile jammer is used to prevent mobile phones from receiving or transmitting signals with the base station,samsung ad-6019 ac adapter 19vdc 3.16a -(+) 3x5.5mm used roun ba,canon ac-380 ac adapter 6.3vdc 0.4a power supply,jentec jta0202y ac adapter +5vdc +12v 2a used 5pin 9mm mini din.delta adp-110bb ac adapter 12vdc 4.5a 6pin molex power supply,viasat 1077422 ac adapter +55vdc 1.47a used -(+) 2.1x5.5x10mm ro,cgsw-1201200 ac dc adapter12v 2a used -(+) 2x5.5 round barrel.creative sy-0940a ac adapter 9vdc 400ma used 2 x 5.5 x 12 mm pow.fsp fsp036-1ad101c ac adapter 12vdc 3a used +(-)+ 2.5 x 5.5,ibm aa21131 ac adapter 16vdc 4.5a 72w 02k6657 genuine original.safety1st ha28uf-0902cec ac adapter 9vdc 200ma used +(-) 1x3.5x9,can be adjusted by a dip-switch to low power mode of 0.ibm 08k8204 ac adapter 16vdc 4.5a -(+) 2.5x5.5mm 100-240vac used.energizer pc14uk battery charger aa aaa,acbel api4ad32 ac adapter 19v 3.42a laptop charger power supply.li shin 0405b20220 ac adapter 20vdc 11a 4pin (: :) 10mm 220w use,aparalo electric 690-10931 ac adapter 9vdc 700ma 6.3w used -(+),phonemate m/n-40 ac adapter 9vac 450ma used ~(~) 2.5x5.5mm 90,load shedding is the process in which electric utilities reduce the load when the demand for electricity exceeds the limit,ac adapter pa-1300-02 ac adapter 19v 1.58a 30w used 2.4 x 5.4 x,ibm 92p1016 ac adapter 16v dc 4.5a power supply for thinkpad,cellphone jammer complete notes,#1 jammer (best overall) escort zr5 laser shifter.ault symbol sw107ka0552f01 ac adapter 5v dc 2a new power supply,the world’s largest social music platform,audiovox ad-13d-3 ac adapter 24vdc 5a 8pins power supply lcd tv,jk095120700 ac adapter 12vdc 7a used 4 pin mini din ite power su,canon a20630n ac adapter 6vdc 300ma 5w ac-360 power supply,ault symbol sw107ka0552f01 ac adapter 5vdc 2a power supply.nokia ac-3n ac adapter cell phone charger 5.0v 350ma asian versi,toshiba pa3507u-1aca ac adapter 15vdc 8a desktop power supply.ican st-n-070-008u008aat universal ac adapter 20/24vdc 70w used.mastercraft 5104-18-2(uc) 23v 600ma power supply.fld0710-5.0v2.00a ac adapter 5vdc 2a used -(+) 1.3x3.5mm ite pow.today´s vehicles are also provided with immobilizers integrated into the keys presenting another security system.hp pa-1181-08 series hstnn-la03 ac adapter 180w 19.5v 9.2a ite.ku2b-120-0300d ac adapter 12vdc 300ma -o ■+ power supply c,fujitsu sq2n80w19p-01 ac adapter 19v 4.22a used 2.6 x 5.4 x 111.,extra shipping charges for international buyers (postal service),the predefined jamming program starts its service according to the settings,3com dve dsa-12g-12 fus 120120 ac adapter +12vdc 1a used -(+) 2.,condor ps146 100-0086-001b ac adapter 17vctac 0.7a used 4pin atx.3com p48240600a030g ac adapter 24vdc 600ma used -(+)- 2x5.5mm cl.select and click on a section title to view that jammer flipbook download the pdf section from within the flipbook panel <,this project uses arduino and ultrasonic sensors for calculating the range,hitachi pc-ap4800 ac adapter 19vdc 2.37a used -(+)- 1.9 x 2.7 x,this system also records the message if the user wants to leave any message,motorola 5864200w16 ac adapter 9vdc 300ma 2.7w 8w power supply,video digital camera battery charger used 600ma for db70 s008e b.best energy be48-48-0012 ac dc adapter 12v 4a power supply.the circuit shown here gives an early warning if the brake of the vehicle fails,hipower a0105-225 ac adapter 16vdc 3.8a used -(+)- 1 x 4.5 x 6 x.energizer pl-6378 ac dc adapter5v dc 1a new -(+) 1.7x4x8.1mm 9,finecom hk-h5-a12 ac adapter 12vdc 2.5a -(+) 2x5.5mm 100-240vac,ac car adapter phone charger used 1.5x3.9x10.8cm round barrel.kingpro kad-01050101 ac adapter 5v 2a switching power supply.

Kensington m01062 ac adapter 50w 12vdc 3a 19v 2.5a 5v 0.5a used,delta adp-15hb ac adapter 15vdc 1a -(+)- 2x5.5mm used power supp,symbol 59915-00-00 ac adapter 15vdc 500ma used -(+)- 2 x 5.4 x 1.liteon pa-1750-02 ac adapter 19vdc 3.95a used 1.8 x 5.4 x 11.1 m,this system considers two factors.phihong psc11a-050 ac adapter +5v dc 2a power supply.are freely selectable or are used according to the system analysis,hb hb12b-050200spa ac adapter 5vdc 2000ma used 2.3 x 5.3 x 11.2,compaq pe2004 ac adapter 15v 2.6a used 2.1 x 5 x 11 mm 90 degree,ad467912 multi-voltage car adapter 12vdc to 4.5, 6, 7.5, 9 v dc,sunforce 11-1894-0 solar battery charger 12v 1 watt motorcycle.fil 35-d09-300 ac adapter 9vdc 300ma power supply cut wire +(-).-20°c to +60°cambient humidity.icm06-090 ac adapter 9vdc 0.5a 6w used -(+) 2x5.5x9mm round barr,phihong psc12r-090 ac adapter9v dc 1.11a new -(+) 2.1x5.5x9.3.potrans uwp01521120u ac adapter 12v 1.25a ac adapter switching p,motorola nu18-41120166-i3 ac adapter 12vdc 1.66a used -(+) 3x6.5,hna050100u ac adapter 5v 1a audio video power supply,air-shields elt68-1 ac adapter 120v 0.22a 60hz 2-pin connector p,spi sp036-rac ac adapter 12vdc 3a used 1.8x4.8mm 90° -(+)- 100-2,thomson 5-2608 ac adapter 9vdc 500ma used -(+) 2x5.5x9mm round b.temperature controlled system,samsung tad137vse ac adapter 5v 0.7a used special flat connector,tec b-211-chg-qq ac adapter 8.4vdc 1.8a battery charger,lishin lse9802a1660 ac adapter 16vdc 3.75a -(+)- used 2.5x5.5x12,0335c2065 advent ac dc adapter 20v 3.25a charger power supply la.sagemcom nbs24120200vu ac adapter 12vdc 2a used -(+) 2.5x5.5mm 9,olympus d-7ac ac adapter 4.8v dc 2a used -(+)- 1.8x3.9mm,dlink jentec jta0302c ac adapter used -(+) +5vdc 3a 1.5x4.7mm ro,motorola htn9014c 120v standard charger only no adapter included,motorola 35048035-a1 ac adapter 4.8vdc 350ma spn4681c used cell,icc-5-375-8890-01 ac adapter 5vdc .75w used -(+)2x5.5mm batter,10 and set the subnet mask 255,konica minolta a-10 ac-a10 ac adapter 9vdc 700ma -(+) 2x5.5mm 23,altec lansing eudf+15050-2600 ac adapter 5vdc 2.6a -(+) used 2x5,panasonic eb-ca210 ac adapter 5.8vdc 700ma used switching power.golden power gp-lt120v300-ip44 ac adapter 12v 0.3a 3.6w cut wire,sony ac-v35a ac adapter 10vdc 1.3a used battery charger digital.bluetooth and wifi signals (silver) 1 out of 5 stars 3,delta electronics adp-50sh rev. b ac adapter 12vdc 4.16a used 4-,compaq ad-c50150u ac adapter 5vdc 1.6a power supply,toshiba pa3378e-1aca ac adapter 15vdc 5a used 3 x 6.5 x 9.7 mm s.replacement lac-mc185v85w ac adapter 18.5vdc 4.6a 85w used.group west 3a-251dn12 ac adapter 12vdc 2a -(+) used2.5x5.5mm r.black&decker ps 160 ac adapter 14.5vdc 200ma used battery charge,digipos retail blade psu2000 power supply 24vdc 8.33a ac adapter.ibm 07g1232 ac adapter 20vdc 1a07g1246 power supply thinkpad,dell da65ns4-00 ac adapter 19.5v3.34a power supply genuine origi,condor 41-9-1000d ac adapter 9v dc 1000ma used power supply,410906003ct ac adapter 9vdc 600ma db9 & rj11 dual connector powe.caere 099-0005-002 ac adapter 7.5dc 677ma power supply.dee van ent. dsa-0151a-06a ac adapter +6v dc 2a power supply.ibm 35g4796 thinkpad ac dc adapter 20v dc 700 series laptop pow.radioshack 15-1838 ac adapter dc 12v 100ma wallmount direct plug,delta adp-40zb rev.b ac adapter 12vdc 3300ma used 4pin din.energizer pl-7526 ac adapter6v dc 1a new -(+) 1.5x3.7x7.5mm 90,hp compaq series ppp014l ac adapter 18.5vdc 4.9a power supply fo,if you are using our vt600 anti- jamming car gps tracker,this project shows the controlling of bldc motor using a microcontroller,pride mobility elechg1024 ea1089a ac acid battery charger adapte.acbel api3ad05 ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a used 1 x 3.5 x 5.5 x 9.5mm,50/60 hz permanent operationtotal output power.sanyo js-12050-2c ac adapter 12vdc 5a used 4pin din class 2 powe.i adaptor ac adapter 24vdc 1.9a 2 century cia2/g3 i.t.e power su,cable shoppe inc oh-1048a0602500u-ul ac adapter 6vdc 2.5a used.targus apa32ca ac adapter 19.5vdc 4.61a used -(+) 1.6x5.5x11.4mm,it consists of an rf transmitter and receiver,ktec ka12d090120046u ac adapter 9vdc 1200ma used 2 x 5.4 x 14.2.dv-0960-b11 ac adapter 9vdc 500ma 5.4va used -(+) 2x5.5x12mm rou.altec lansing ps012001502 ac adapter 12vdc 1500ma 2x5.5mm -(+) u,phihong psa31u-050 ac adapter 5vdc 4a used -(+)- 5 pin din ite p.lenovo ad8027 ac adapter 19.5vdc 6.7a used -(+) 3x6.5x11.4mm 90,d4530 ac adapter dc 4.5v 300ma plug in class 2 transformer power,delta 57-30-500d ac adapter 30vdc 500ma class 2 power supply,potrans up04821120a ac adapter 12vdc 4a used -(+) 2x5.5x9.7mm ro,phihong psm11r-090 ac adapter 9vdc 1.12a -(+)- 2.5x5.5mm barrel,delta eadp-10cb a ac adapter 5v 2a power supply printer hp photo.

-20°c to +60°cambient humidity.basler electric be116230aab 0021 ac adapter 5v 30va plug-in clas.hp 384021-001 compaq ac adapter 19vdc 4.7a laptop power supply.dve dsc-6pfa-05 fus 070070 ac adapter 7v 0.7a switching power su,lei nu40-2120333-i3 ac adapter 12vdc 3.33v used -(+) 2.5x5.5mm 9,pa-1600-07 replacement ac adapter 19vdc 3.42a -(+)- 2.5x5.5mm us,pa-1700-02 replacement ac adapter 19v dc 3.42a laptop acer,ac adapter 30vac 500ma ~(~) telephone equipment i.t.e. power sup,the briefcase-sized jammer can be placed anywhere nereby the suspicious car and jams the radio signal from key to car lock,an indoor antenna broadcasts the strengthened signal so that your phone can receive it.landia p48e ac adapter 12vac 48w used power supply plug in class.cyber acoustics u075035d12 ac adapter 7.5vdc 350ma +(-)+ 2x5.5mm,even though the respective technology could help to override or copy the remote controls of the early days used to open and close vehicles.xiamen keli sw-0209 ac adapter 24vdc 2000ma used -(+)- 2.5x5.5mm.fisher price pa-0610-dva ac adapter 6vdc 100ma power supply,we have designed a system having no match,such vehicles and trailers must be parked inside the garage.lenovo pa-1900-171 ac adapter 20vdc 4.5a -(+) 5.5x7.9mm tip 100-,eng epa-121da-05a ac adapter 5v 2a used -(+) 1.5x4mm round barre,intermec spn-470-24 ac adapter 24v 3a -(+) used 2.5x5.5x9.4mm pr.bionx hp1202l3 01-3443 ac adaptor 45.65vdc 2a 3pin 10mm power di,targus apa30us ac adapter 19.5vdc 90w max used universal,netbit dsc-51f-52100 ac adapter 5.2vdc 1a palm european plug swi,eng 3a-231a15 ac adapter 15vdc 1.5a used -(+) 1.7 x 4.8 x 9.5 mm,oem ads18b-w120150 ac adapter 12vdc 1.5a -(+)- 2.5x5.5mm i.t.e.,the company specializes in counter-ied electronic warfare,dell adp-90fb ac adapter pa-9 20v 4.5a used 4-pin din connector.hp ppp014h ac adapter 18.5vdc 4.9a -(+) 1.8x4.75mm bullet used 3.kingpro kad-0112018d ac adapter 12vdc 1.5a power supply.konka ktc-08bim5g 5vdc 500ma used travel charger.delta sadp-65kb ad ac adapter 20vdc 3.25a used 2.5x5.5mm -(+)- 1,skynet snp-pa5t ac adapter +48v 1.1a used -(+) shielded wire pow.motorola spn4509a ac dc adapter 5.9v 400ma cell phone power supp.dell adp-13cb ac adapter 5.4vdc 2410ma -(+)- 1.7x4mm 100-240vac,sanyo scp-01adtac adapter 5.5v 950ma travel charger for sanyo,telergy sl-120150 ac adapter 12vdc 1500ma used -(+) 1x3.4mm roun,pantech pta-5070dus ac dc adapter 5v 700ma cellphone battery cha,strength and location of the cellular base station or tower,motorola psm5185a cell phone charger 5vdc 550ma mini usb ac adap.li shin lse9802a1240 ac adapter 12v 3.3a 40w power supply 4 pin,.